PRESENT ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Volume 18, Issue no.1/ 2024

Authors :

Loredana COPACEAN 1 , Eugen Teodor MAN 1 , Sorin HERBAN 1 , Cosmin Alin POPESCU 2 , Luminita COJOCARIU 2,3 *

1 Politehnica University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania 

2 University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania 

3 Agricultural Research and Development Station Lovrin, Lovrin, Romania

E-mail : * Corresponding author: luminita_cojocariu@usvt.ro

https://doi.org/10.47743/pesd2024181009

VIEW FULL TEXT

1. Ahmadlou, M.; Al-Fugara, A.; Al-Shabeeb, A.R.; Arora, A.; Al-Adamat, R.; Pham, Q.B.; Al- Ansari, N.; Linh, N.T.T.; Sajedi, H. (2020) Flood susceptibility mapping and assessment using a novel deep learning model combining multilayer perceptron and autoencoder neural networks. J Flood Risk Manag, 14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12683
2.   Anni, A.H.; Cohen, S.; Praskievicz, S. (2020) Sensitivity of urban flood simulations to stormwater infrastructure and soil in-filtration. J Hydrol, 588, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125028 
3. Antzoulatos, G.; Kouloglou, I.-O.; Bakratsas, M.; Moumtzidou, A.; Gialampoukidis, I.; Karakostas, A.; Lombardo, F.; Fiorin, R.; Norbiato, D.; Ferri, M.; Symeonidis, A.; Vrochidis, S.; Kompatsiaris, I. (2022) Flood Hazard and Risk Mapping by Applying an Explainable Machine Learning Framework Using Satellite Imagery and GIS Data. Sustainability, 14, 3251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063251 
4. ArcGIS (2022) Documentation. Available online: https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/documentation/ (accessed on 25.10.2022)
5.   Arhiva Administratiei Bazinale de Apa (ABA) Crisuri, 2023. 
6. Arnold, C.L.; Gibbons, C.J. (1996) Impervious Surface Coverage: The Emergence of a Key Environmental Indicator. J Am Plan Assoc, 62, 243–258, https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975688
7.   Cai, S.; Fan, J.; Yang, W. (2021) Flooding Risk Assessment and Analysis Based on GIS and the TFN-AHP Method: A Case Study of Chongqing, China. Atmosphere, 12(5), 623, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12050623 
8. Caluseru, A.L.; Cojocariu, L.; Horablaga, M.N.; Bordean, D-M.; Horablaga, A.; Cojocariu, A.; Borozan A.B.; Iancu, T. (2013) Romanian National Strategy for the conservation of biodiversity 2013 – 2020 – integration of european environmental policies. SGEM 2013 Conf Proceedings, 2, 723-728. https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEM2013/BE5.V2/S23.013 
9. Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Nie, Z. (2015) Improving assessment of groundwater sustainability with analytic hierarchy process and information entropy method: A case study of the Hohhot Plain, China. Environ Earth Sci, 73, 2353–2363, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3583-0 
10. Climatic Database (2023) Weather in Romania. Available online: https://rp5.ru/Weather_in_Romania (accessed on 23.01.2023) 
11. Copacean, L.; Zisu, I.; Mazare, V.; Cojocariu, L. (2019) Analysis of land use changes and their influence on soil features. Case study: Seca? village, Timi? County (Romania), PESD, 13, 2. https://doi.org/10.2478/pesd-2019-0032 
12. Copernicus Land Monitoring Service (2022) Corine Land Cover - CLC. Available online at: https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover (accessed on 20.05.2022) 
13. Copernicus Open Access Hub (2023) Available online: https://scihub.copernicus.eu/dhus/#/home (accessed on 23.01.2024) 
14. Costache, R.; Zaharia, L. (2017) Flash-flood potential assessment and mapping by integrating the weights-of-evidence and frequency ratio statistical methods in GIS environment—Case study: Bâsca Chiojdului River catchment (Romania). J Earth Syst Sci, 126, 59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0828-9 
15. Covaci, O.; Gazda, M.R.; Niga, B.I.; Enea, A.; Iosub, M.; Tirnovan, A. (2023) Automation of the Rational Formula using GIS infrastructure – Case study Siret River Basin – Romania. PESD, 17(2), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.47743/pesd2023172003 
16. Craciun, A.; Costache, R.; Barbulescu, A.; Pal, S.C.; Costache, I.; Dumitriu, C.?. (2022) Modern Techniques for Flood Susceptibility Estimation across the Deltaic Region (Danube Delta) from the Black Sea’s Romanian Sector. J Mar Sci Eng, 10, 1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10081149 
17. Das, J.; Bhattacharya, S.K. (2023) Monitoring and managing multi-hazards: a Multidisciplinary Approach. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15377-8 
18. Diakakis, M. (2011) A method for flood hazard mapping based on basin morphometry: application in two catchments in Greece. Nat Hazards, 56(3), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9592-8 
19. Diaz, J.H. (2006) Global Climate Changes, Natural Disasters, and Travel Health Risks. J Travel Med, 13, 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8305.2006.00072.x 
20. Dicu, D.; Bertici, R.; Herbei, M.; Sala, F. (2022) Characterization of a Pasture Area Based on Soil Agrochemical Indices and Improvement Measures. Sci Pap Ser Manag Econ Eng Agric Rural Dev, 22(1), 167–174. 
21. Dragomir, A.; Tudorache, A-V.; Costache, R-D. (2020) Assessment of flash-flood susceptibility in small river basins. PESD, 14(1), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.15551/pesd2020141010 
22. Dube, M. (2018) Bihar Floods: A Report on Bihar Floods 2016; Bihar Disaster Management Authority, Government of Bihar: Patna, India; p. 36. 
23. Eriyagama, N.; Thilakarathne, M.; Tharuka, P.; Munaweera, T.; Muthuwatta, L.; Smakhtin, V.; Premachandra, W.W.; Pindeniya, D.; Wijayarathne, N.S.; Udamulla, L. (2017) Actual and perceived causes of flood risk: Climate versus anthropogenic effects in a wet zone catchment in Sri Lanka. Water Int, 42, 874–892, https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2017.1373321
24.   European Environment Agency (EEA) (2016) Digital Elevation Model (DEM). Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/copernicus-land-monitoring- service-eu-dem (accessed on 13.11.2016) 
25. Foudi, S.; Osés-Eraso, N.; Tamayo, I. (2015) Integrated spatial flood risk assessment: the case of Zaragoza. Land Use Policy, 42, 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.002
26.   Geospatial (2021) România: seturi de date vectoriale generale. Available online: http://geo- spatial.org/vechi/download/romania-seturi-vectoriale (accessed on 10.11.2021) 
27. GIS & RS Solution, Flood Susceptibility Mapping using GIS-AHP Multi-criteria Analysis. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lbbyi1YV2Hc&list=RDCMUCs1fLqqz84QbQ89DnRmME VQ&index=1 (accessed on 16.01.2024) 
28. Hagos, Y.G.; Andualem, T.G.; Yibeltal, M. et al. (2022) Flood hazard assessment and mapping using GIS integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis in upper Awash River basin, Ethiopia. Appl Water Sci, 12, 148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01674-8 
29. Hammami, S.; Zouhri, L.; Souissi, D. et al. (2019) Application of the GIS based multi- criteria decision analysis and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the flood susceptibility mapping (Tunisia). Arab J Geosci, 12, 653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4754-9 
30. He, B.; Huang, X.; Ma, M.; Chang, Q.; Tu, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhang, K.; Hong, Y. (2017) Analysis of flash flood disaster characteristics in China from 2011 to 2015. Nat Hazards, 90, 407–420, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3052-7 
31. Herbei, M.V.; Bertici, R.; Sala, F. (2021) Geomatic Methods for management planning of protected areas. Case study: Paniova forest, Timis County, Romania. Sci papers – series E – Land reclamation Earth observation & surveying environmental engineering, 10, 301- 310. 
32. Houghton-Carr, H.A.; Print, C.R.; Fry, M.J.; Gadain, H.; Muchiri, P. (2011) An assessment of the surface water resources of the Juba-Shabelle basin in southern Somalia. Hydrol Sci J 56(5), 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.585470 
33. Iosub, M.; Minea, I.; Chelariu, O.E.; Ursu, A. (2020) Assessment of flash flood susceptibility potential in Moldavian Plain (Romania). J Flash Flood Risk Manag, 13. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12588 
34. Kopecký, M.; Macek, M.; Wild, J. (2021) Topographic Wetness Index calculation guidelines based on measured soil moisture and plant species composition. Sci Total Environ, 757, 143785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143785 
35. Kourgialas, N.N.; Karatzas, G. (2011) Flood management and a GIS modelling method to assess flood-hazard areas— a case study. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56(2):212–225, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.555836 
36. Kourgialas, N.N.; Anyfanti, I.; Karatzas, G.P.; Dokou, Z. (2018) An integrated method for assessing drought prone areas–Water efficiency practices for a climate resilient Mediterranean agriculture. Sci Total Enviro., 625, 1290–1300, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.051 
37. Kumar, R.; Kumar, M.; Tiwari, A.; Majid, S.I.; Bhadwal, S.; Sahu, N.; Avtar, R. (2023) Assessment and Mapping of Riverine Flood Susceptibility (RFS) in India through Coupled Multicriteria Decision Making Models and Geospatial Techniques. Water, 15, 3918. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15223918 
38. Kundzewicz, Z.W.; Pinskwar, I.; Brakenridge, G.R. (2014) Large floods in Europe, 1985–2009; Hydrol Sci J, 58(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2012.745082 
39. Kundzewicz, Z.W.; Su, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, G.; Wang, G.; Huang, J.; Jiang, T. (2019) Flood risk in a range of spatial perspectives—From global to local scales. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 19, 1319–1328. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1319-2019 
40. Liu, K.; Li, Z.; Yao, C.; Chen, J.; Zhang, K.; Saifullah, M. (2016) Coupling the k-nearest neighbor procedure with the Kalman filter for real-time updating of the hydraulic model in flood forecasting. Int J Sediment Res, 31, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2016.02.002 
41. Liu, C.C.; Shieh, M.C.; Ke, M.S.; Wang, K.H. (2018) Flood Prevention and Emergency Response System Powered by Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens, 10, 1283,. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081283
42.   Magesh, N.S.; Chandrasekar, N.; Soundranayagam, J.P. (2012) Delineation of groundwater potential zones in Theni district, Tamil Nadu, using remote sensing, GIS and MIF techniques. Geosci Front, 3(2),189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2011.10.007 
43. Magureanu, M.; Sfîrcoci, M.; Copacean, L.; Cojocariu, L. (2023) Monitoring the vegetation coverage of the grasslands in the Poiana Rusca Mountains using different remote sensing indices. PESD, 17, 189-199. https://doi.org/10.47743/pesd2023172014 
44. Mâsu, S.; Cojocariu, L.; Horablaga, N.M.; Bordean, D-M.; Borozan, A.B.; Cojocariu, A.; Pop, G.; Sandoiu, I.C. (2013) The effects of Triticum aestivum species for the phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil, SGEM 2013 Conference Proceedings, 1, 963-970. https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEM2013/BE5.V1/S20.126 
45. Mâsu, S.; Cojocariu, L.; Grecu, E.; Morariu, F.; Bordean, D.M.; Horablaga, M.; Nita, L.; Nita S. (2018) Lolium Perenne - A Phytoremediation Option in Case of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Polluted Soils. Rev Chim, 69(5), 1110-1114, https://doi.org/10.37358/RC.18.5.6270 
46. Merz, B.; Blöschl, G.; Vorogushyn, S.; Dottori, F.; Aerts, J.C.J.H.; Bates, P.; Bertola, M.; Kemter, M.; Kreibich, H.; Lall, U.; Macdonald, E. (2021) Causes, impacts and patterns of disastrous river floods. Nat Rev Earth Environ, 2, 592–609. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00195-3 
47. Meyer, V.; Becker, N.; Markantonis, V.; Schwarze, R.; Bergh, J.; Bouwer, L.; Bubeck, P.; Ciavola, P.; Genovese, E.; Green, C.; Hallegatte, S.; Kreibich, H.; Lequeux, Q.; Logar, I.; Papyrakis, E.; Pfurtscheller, C.; Poussin, J.; Przyluski, V.; Thieken, A. (2013) Assessing the costs of natural hazards—state of the art and knowledge gaps. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13(5), 1351–1373. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1351-2013 
48. Mitra, R.; Das, J. (2022) A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modelling of GIS- based TOPSIS, VIKOR, and EDAS techniques in the sub-himalayan foothills region of Eastern India. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 30, 16036–16067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356- 022-23168-5 
49. Nuissl, H.; Haase, D.; Lanzendorf, M.; Wittmer, H. (2009) Environmental impact assessment of urban land use transitions—a context-sensitive approach. Land Use Policy, 26(2), 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.05.006
50.   Osman, S.A.; Das, J. (2023) GIS-based flood risk assessment using multi-criteria decision analysis of Shebelle River Basin in southern Somalia. SN Appl Sci, 5, 134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05360-5 
51. Patrikaki, O.; Kazakis, N.; Kougias, I.; Patsialis, T.; Theodossiou, N.; Voudouris, K. (2018) Assessing flood hazard at river basin scale with an index-based approach: the case of Mouriki, Greece. Geosciences, 8(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8020050 
52. Pinos, J.; Quesada-Román, A. (2022) Flood Risk-Related Research Trends in Latin America and the Caribbean. Water, 14, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010010 
53. Popa, M.C.; Peptenatu, D.; Draghici, C.C.; Diaconu, D.C. (2019) Flood Hazard Mapping Using the Flood and Flash-Flood Potential Index in the Buzau River Catchment, Romania. Water, 11, 2116. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102116 
54. Popescu, N.C.; Barbulescu, A. (2023) Flood Hazard Evaluation Using a Flood Potential Index. Water, 15, 3533. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15203533 
55. Posea, G.; Badea, L. (1984) România. Unitatile de relief (Regionarea geomorfologica), Ed. Stiintifica si Enciclopedica, Bucuresti. 
56. Pradhan, B. (2009) Flood susceptible mapping and risk area delineation using logistic regression, GIS and Remote sensing. J. Spat. Hydrol., 9, 1–18, https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/josh/vol9/iss2/4/ 
57. Purohit, J.; Rout, H.S. (2023) Impact of climate change on human health concerning climate-induced natural disaster: Evidence from an eastern Indian state. Clim Chang, 176, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03578-1 
58. Quesada-Román, A.; Ballesteros-Cánovas, J.A.; Granados-Bolaños, S.; Birkel, C.; Stoffel, M. (2022) Improving regional flood risk assessment using flood frequency and dendrogeomorphic analyses in mountain catchments impacted by tropical cyclones. Geomorphology, 396, 108000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.108000 
59. Rahmati, O.; Pourghasemi, H.R.; Zeinivand, H. (2015) Flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models in the Golastan Province, Iran. Geocarto Int, 31, 42–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2015.1041559 
60. Rahmati, O.; Haghizadeh, A.; Stefanidis, S. (2016) Assessing the accuracy of GIS-based analytical hierarchy process for watershed prioritization; Gorganrood River Basin, Iran. Water resour manag, 30(3), 1131–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2015.1041559
61.   Raj, R.; Yunus, A.P.; Pani, P.; Avtar, R. (2022) Towards evaluating gully erosion volume and erosion rates in the Chambal badlands, Central India. Land Degrad Dev, 33, 1495–1510. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4250 
62. Rehman, S.; Hasan, M.S.U.; Rai, A.K.; Rahaman, M.H.; Avtar, R.; Sajjad, H. (2022) Integrated approach for spatial flood susceptibility assessment in Bhagirathi sub-basin, India using entropy information theory and geospatial technology. Risk Anal, 42, 2765–2780. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13887 
63. Roo, A.D.; Barredo, J.; Lavalle, C.; Bodis, K.; Bonk, R. (2007) Potential flood hazard and risk mapping at Pan-European scale; In Digital terrain modelling development and applications in a policy support environment; Peckham R.J., Jordan G., Eds.; Springer- Berlin: Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany; pp. 183–202. 
64. Romanescu, G.; Cimpianu, C.I.; Mihu-Pintilie, A.; Stoleriu, C.C. (2017) Historic flood events in NE Romania (post-1990). J Maps, 13(2), 787-798, https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2017.1383944
65.   Rusu, R. (2007) Organizarea spatiului geografic în Banat; Ed. Mirton: Timisoara, Romania. 
66. Saaty, T.L.; Tran, L.T. (2007) On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Math Comput Model, 46, 962–975, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.022 
67. Said, N.; Ahmad, K.; Riegler, M.; Pogorelov, K.; Hassan, L.; Ahmad, N.; Conci, N. (2019) Natural disasters detection in social media and satellite imagery: A survey. Multimed. Tools Appl, 78, 31267–31302, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-07942-1 
68. Sahana, M.; Rehman, S.; Sajjad, H.; Hong, H. (2020) Exploring effectiveness of frequency ratio and support vector machine models in storm surge flood susceptibility assessment: A study of Sundarban Biosphere Reserve, India. Catena, 189, 104450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104450 
69. Santangelo, N.; Santo, A.; Di Crescenzo, G.; Foscari, G.; Liuzza, V.; Sciarrotta, S.; Scorpio, V. (2011) Flood susceptibility assessment in a highly urbanized alluvial fan: The case study of Sala Consilina (southern Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 11, 2765–2780. https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/11/2765/2011/ 
70. Senanayake, D.; Dissanayake, B.; Mayadunna, W. (2016) An approach to delineate groundwater recharge potential sites in Ambalantota, Sri Lanka using GIS techniques. Geosci J, 7(1):115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2015.03.002
71.   Siahkamari, S.; Haghizadeh, A.; Zeinivand, H.; Tahmasebipour, N.; Rahmati, O. (2018) Spatial prediction of flood-susceptible areas using frequency ratio and maximum entropy models. Geocarto Int, 33, 927–941, https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2017.1316780 
72. Simon, M.; Popescu, C.A.; Copacean, L.; Cojocariu, L. (2020) Complex model based on UAV technology for investigating pastoral space. PESD, 14(2), 139 – 150. https://doi.org/10.15551/pesd2020142011 
73. Simon, M.; Copacean, L.; Cojocariu, L. (2022) Techniques for identification, mapping and analysis of grasslands. Case study: Arad county. PESD, 16(2), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.47743/pesd2022162004
74.   Souissi, D.; Zouhri, L.; Hammami, S.; Msaddek, M.H.; Zghibi, A.; Dlala, M. (2019) GIS- based MCDM-AHP modeling for flood susceptibility mapping of arid areas, southeastern Tunisia. Geocarto Int, 35, 991–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1566405 
75. Swain, K.C.; Singha, C.; Nayak, L. (2020) Flood Susceptibility Mapping through the GIS- AHP Technique Using the Cloud. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf, 9, 720. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9120720 
76. Tama?-Avram, M.; Luca, M.; Marcoie, N. (2022) Fast floods on the Trotu? river in the context of current climate change. PESD, 17(3), 44-45. https://doi.org/10.47743/pesd2022162016
77.   Tanga, X.; Lib, J.; Liuc, M.; Liud, W.; Hong, H. (2019) Flood susceptibility assessment based on a novel random Naïve Bayes method: A comparison between different factor discretization. Catena, 189, 104536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104536 
78. Tehrany, M.S.; Kumar, L. (2018) The application of a Dempster–Shafer-based evidential belief function in flood susceptibility mapping and comparison with frequency ratio and logistic regression methods. Environ Earth Sci, 77, 490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665- 018-7667-0 
79. Ushiyama, T.; Kwak, Y.; Ledvinka, O.; Iwami, Y.; Danhelka, J. (2017) Interdisciplinary approach for assessment of continental river flood risk: a case study of the Czech Republic. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 19, 5737. 
80. Vegad, U.; Pokhrel, Y.; Mishra, V.; Ghosh, A.; Kar, S.K. (2018) Application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for flood risk assessment: A case study in Malda district of West Bengal, India. Hydrol. Earth Syst Sci Discuss, 94, 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3392-y 
81. Wang, Y.; Fang, Z.; Hong, H.; Peng, L. (2020) Flood susceptibility mapping using convolutional neural network frameworks. J Hydrol, 582, 124482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124482
82.   Yin, J.; Guo, S.; Liu, Z.; Yang, G.; Zhong, Y.; Liu, D. (2018) Uncertainty analysis of bivariate design flood estimation and its im-pacts on reservoir routing. Water Resour Manag, 32. 1795–1809, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1904-x 
83. Youssef, A.; Pradhan, B.; Hassan, A. (2011) Flash flood risk estimation along the St. Katherine road, southern Sinai, Egypt using GIS based morphometry and satellite imagery. Environ Earth Sci, 62(3), 611–623, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0551-1 
84. Zaharia, L.; Costache, R.; Pravalie, R. et al. (2015) Assessment and mapping of flood potential in the Slanic catchment in Romania. J Earth Syst Sci, 124, 1311–1324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-015-0608-3 
85. . Zhao, G.; Pang, B.; Xu, Z.; Peng, D.; Xu, L. (2018) Assessment of urban flood susceptibility using semi-supervised machine learning model. Sci Total Environ, 659, 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.217 
86.