PRESENT ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Volume 15, Issue no.1/ 2021

Authors :

Alexandru Rusu 1*, Octavian Groza 2 , Radu Necșuliu 3

1 Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași, Romania

2 Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași, Romania

3 Ministry of Development, Public Works and Administration

E-mail : * Corresponding author: : alexrusucuguat@yahoo.com

https://doi.org/10.15551/pesd2021151010

VIEW FULL TEXT

1. Conceptul strategic de dezvoltare teritorială – România 2030, MDLPL - INCD Urban Proiect, 2008
2. STRATEGIA DE DEZVOLTARE TERITORIALĂ A ROMÂNIEI - România policentrică 2035, Coeziune şi competitivitate teritorială, dezvoltare şi şanse egale pentru oameni, MDRAP, 2015
3. PROFECY - Inner Peripheries: National territories facing challenges of access to basic services of general interest, ESPON, 2017, https://www.espon.eu/inner-peripheries
4. Scenarios for accessibility by the sea, road, rail, air and multimodal, ESPON, 2020, https://www.espon.eu/access-scenarios
5. Atlasul teritorial al României – instrument de analiză teritorială, CUGUAT-TIGRIS, MDLPL, 2008, http://old.mdrap.ro/_documente/atlas/index.htm.
6. Piotr Rosik, Marcin Stępniak, Tomasz Komornicki, The decade of the big push to roads in Poland: Impact on improvement in accessibility and territorial cohesion from a policy perspective, Transport Policy, Volume 37, 2015, Pages 134-146, ISSN 0967-070X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.10.007.
7. Gutiérrez, J., Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Journal of Transportation Geography, 2001. , 9 (4), https://doi.org/10.1016/s0966-6923(01)00017-5.
8. Schürmann, C., Spiekermann, K., Wegener, M. Accessibility indicators: model and report. In: SASI Deliverable D5. Report to the European Commission. Institute für Raumplanung, Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, 1997.
9. ESDP European Spatial Development Perspective Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union, Agreed at the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning in Potsdam, May 1999, Published by the European Commission, 1999 https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/sum_en.pdf
10. Variantă finală revizuită a Raportului privind Master Planul pe termen scurt, mediu și lung, Guvernul României, Ministerul Transporturilor, 2016
11. Gutiérrez, J., Condeço-Melhorado, A., López, E., Monzón, A. Evaluating the European added value of TEN-T projects: a methodological proposal based on spatial spillovers, accessibility and GIS. Journal of Transportation Geography, 19, 2011 https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.10.011
12. Holl, A., Twenty years of accessibility improvements. The case of the Spanish motorway building programme. Journal of Transportation Geography, 2007, 15 https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.09.003.
13. Biosca, O., Spiekermann, K., Stępniak, M., Transport accessibility at regional scale. EUROPA XXI, 2013, 24, 15–17. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2013.24.1.
14. Reilly, W. J. The law of retail gravitation. Knickerbocker Press: New York, USA, 1931
15. Batty, M. Reilly's challenge: new laws of retail gravitation which define systems of central places. Environment and Planning A 1978, 10, pp. 185-219
16. Huff, D. L. Defining and Estimating a Trade Area. Journal of Marketing, 1964, 28, pp. 34-38
17. Stewart JQ: An Inverse Distance Variation For Certain Social Influences. Science. 1941, 93: 89-90. 10.1126/science.93.2404.89.
18. Stewart, J.Q. Empirical Mathematical Rules concerning the Distribution and Equilibrium of Population, Geographical Review, 1947, 37 (2), 461-485, https://doi.org/10.2307/211132
19. Taylor P, Distance decay in spatial interactions. Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography. 1975, N°2
20. Stępniak, M., Rosik, P., From improvement in accessibility to the impact on territorial cohesion: the spatial approach. Journal of Transportation and Land Use, 2016, 9 (3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.570
21. López, E., Gutiérrez, J., Gómez, G., Measuring regional cohesion effects of large- scale transport infrastructure investments: an accessibility approach. European Plannning Studies, 2008, 16, 277–301, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310701814629 PESD 2021, 15, 1 141
22. Schürmann, C., Talaat, A., Towards a European Peripherality Index. Final Report. vol. 53 Report for General Directorate XVI Regional Policy of the European Commission. Berichte aus dem Institut für Raumplanung der Universität Dortmund, 2000
23. Spiekermann, K., Neubauer, J., European Accessibility and Peripherality: Concepts, Models and Indicators. Nordregio Working Paper, 2002, Stockholm
24. Grasland, C.–Mathian, H.–Vincent, J Multiscalar analysis and map generalisation of discrete social phenomena: Statistical problems and political consequences. Statistical Journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 2000, 17 (2): 157–188
25. Keeble, D., Owens, P.L., Thompson, C., Regional accessibility and economic potential in the European community. Regional Studies, 1982, 16, 419–432
26. C. Grasland, Seven proposals for the construction of geographical position indexes, Study Program on European Spatial Planning, Working Paper from SDEC-France, 1999
27. Boursier-Mougenot, Isidore, Nadine Cattan, Claude Grasland, and Céline Rozenblat. "Images De Potentiels De Population En Europe." L'Espace Géographique, 1993, 22, no. 4, 333-45 http://www.jstor.org/stable/44381243.
28. Atlasul României, Rey V., Groza O., Ianoș I., Pătroescu M., RAO, 2006
29. Groza, Octavian, Polarizare urbană şi cadru administrativ în România. The missing link, in Lucrările Seminarului « Dimitrie Cantemir », 2001, no 21-22, Departamentul de Geografie, Univ. « Alex. I. Cuza » Iaşi, 2002
30. Rusu, A. GIS tools for the evaluation of the territorial impact assessment of transportation projects funded by the European union in Romania, International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, 2015, 2 (2) ,pp.907, 2015
31. Schürmann, C., Spiekermann, K., Wegener, M., Accessibility indicators: model and report. In: SASI Deliverable D5. Report to the European Commission. Institute für Raumplanung, Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, 1997.
32. Östh, J., Reggiani, A., Galiazzo, G., Novel methods for the estimation of cost–- distance decay in potential accessibility models. In: Condeço-Melhorado, A., Reggiani, A., Gutiérrez, J. (Eds.), Accessibility and Spatial Interaction. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2014
33. Spiekermann, K., Wegener, M., Květoň, V., Marada, M., Schürmann, C., Biosca, O., Ulied Segui, A., Antikainen, H., Kotavaara, O., Rusanen, J., Bielańska, D., Fiorello, D., Komornicki, T., Rosik, P., Stępniak, M., TRACC Transport Accessibility at Regional/Local Scale and patterns in Europe. Final Report. ESPON Applied Research, pp. 1–274, 2015
34. Muntele, I., O. Groza, G. Țucănașu, Al Rusu, and D. Tudora. "Calitatea infrastructurii de transporturi ca premisă a diferențierii spațiilor rurale din Moldova." UAIC, 2010
35. Reggiani, A., Bucci, P., Russo, G., Accessibility and impedance forms: empirical applications to the German commuting network, International Regional Science Review, 2011, 34, https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017610387296
36. Martínez, L.M., Viegas, J.M., A new approach to modeling distance-decay functions for accessibility assessment in transport studies, Journal of Transportation Geography, 2013, 26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.08.018
37. Eva, M., Corodescu-Roșca, E., Cehan, A., Muntele, I. Conceptualizarea și măsurarea accesibilității spațiale la serviciile de interes general. Geographia Napocensis, 2020, XIV (1/2), pp. 1-23. (submitted to publication, under evaluation).
38. LEGE nr.351 din 6 iulie 2001 privind aprobarea Planului de amenajare a teritoriului naţional - Secţiunea a IV-a Reţeaua de localităţi, M.Of. nr. 408/24 iul. 2001
39. Liu, S.; Zhu, X. An integrated GIS approach to accessibility analysis. Transactions in GIS, 2004, 8, 45–62.
40. Charles Raux, Aurélie Mercier et Nicolas Ovtracht, Evaluation économique des politiques de transport et indicateurs d’accessibilité spatiale : l'apport des SIG, Cybergeo : European Journal of Geography [En ligne], Systèmes, Modélisation, Géostatistiques, document 435, mis en ligne le 11 décembre 2008, URL:http://journals.openedition.org/cybergeo/21333; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.21333
41. Accessibilité sociale et accessibilité économique mondiales au début des années 1990, Claude Grasland, L'Information Géographique, 1999, 63-3 PESD 2021, 15, 1 142
42. An adaptive inverse-distance weighting spatial interpolation technique, George Y.Lu, David W.Wong, Computers & Geosciences, 2008, Volume 34, Issue 9, September
43. Ioan Ianoş, Alexandru-Ionuţ Petrişor, Daniela Zamfir, Andreea-Loreta Cercleux, Ilinca-Valentina Stoica, Cristian Tălângă, In search of a relevant index measuring territorial disparities in a transition country. Romania as a case study, Die Erde–Journal of the Geographical Society of Berlin, 2013, Volume 144, 1
44. J. Benedek, N. Veress, Economic Disparities and Changes in the Convergence of the Romanian NUTS 2 and NUTS 3 Regions, Romanian Review of Regional Studies, 2013, Vol. 9, Issue 1 [45] Condeço-Melhorado, M., Demirel, H., Kompil, M., Navajas, E., Christidis, P., The impact of measuring internal travel distances on self-potentials and accessibility, European Journal of Transportation Infrastructures, 2016, Res. 16 (2), 300–318.