PRESENT ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Volume 17, Issue no.1/ 2023

Authors :

Alexandru-Ionuț PETRIȘOR 1,2,3,4* , Olga HAREA 2 , Antonio-Valentin TACHE 3,4 , Angela MUNTEANU 2 , Oana-Cătălina POPESCU 3, , Diana ANDRONOVICI 2, Liliana Elza PETRIȘOR 5

1 Doctoral School of Urban Planning, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, Romania; alexandru_petrisor@yahoo.com

2 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Technical University of Moldova, Chisinau, Moldova;

3 National Institute for Research and Development in Tourism, Bucharest, Romania;

4 National Institute for Research and Development in Constructions, Urbanism and Sustainable Spatial Development URBAN-INCERC, Bucharest, Romania;

5 Retired architect and independent researcher, Bucharest, Romania;

E-mail : * Corresponding author: alexandru_petrisor@yahoo.com

https://doi.org/10.47743/pesd2023171022

VIEW FULL TEXT

1. Achen, C., Snidal, D. (1989) Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies. World Politics, 41(2), 143-169. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010405
2. Agnoletti, M., Cargnello, G., Gardin, L., Santoro, A., Bazzoffi, P., Sansone, L., Pezza, L., Belfiore, N. (2011) Traditional landscape and rural development: comparative study in three terraced areas in northern, central and southern Italy to evaluate the efficacy of GAEC standard 4.4 of cross compliance. Italian J Agron., 6(S1), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2011.6.s1.e16
3. Aivaz, K.A., Aram, C. (2021) An analysis of the performance of the companies in Constanţa County which operate in the real estate transactions field in the context of sustainable development. Technium Social Sci. J., 26, 475-487. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v26i1.5315
4. Aouissi, H.A., Petrişor, A.-I., Ababsa, M., Boştenaru-Dan, M., Tourki, M., Bouslama, Z. (2021) Influence of Land Use on Avian Diversity in North African Urban Environments. Land, 10(4), 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10040434
5. Artmann, M., Chen, X., Iojă, I.C., Hof, A., Onose, D.-A., Ponizy, L., Zavodnik Lamovšek, A., Breuste, J.H. (2017a) The role of urban green spaces in care facilities for elderly people across European cities. Urban For. Urban Green., 27, 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.08.007
6. Artmann, M., Kohler, M., Meinel, G., Gan, J., Iojă, I.C. (2017b) How smart growth and green infrastructure can mutually support each other – A conceptual framework for compact and green cities. Ecol. Ind., 96(2), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.001
7. Asadolahi, Z., Salmanmahiny, A., Sakieh, Y., Mirkarimi, S.H., Baral, H., Azimi, M. (2018) Dynamic trade-off analysis of multiple ecosystem services under land use change scenarios: Towards putting ecosystem services into planning in Iran. Ecol. Complexity, 36, 250-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2018.09.003
8. Badiu, D.-L., Iojă, I.C., Pătroescu, M., Breuste, J.H., Artmann, M., Niţă, M.R., Grădinaru, S.R., Hossu, C.A., Onose, D.-A. (2016) Is urban green space per capita a valuable target to achieve cities’ sustainability goals? Romania as a case study. Ecol. Ind., 70, 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.044
9. Baumann, M., Kuemmerle, T., Elbakidze, M., Ozdogana, M., Radeloff, V.C., Keuler, N.S., Prishchepov, A.V., Kruhlovd, I., Hostert P. (2011) Patterns and drivers of post-socialist farmland abandonment in Western Ukraine. Land Use Pol., 28(3), 552-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.003
10. BenDor, T.K., Spurlock, D., Woodruff, S.C., Olander, L. (2017) A research agenda for ecosystem services in American environmental and land use planning. Cities, 60A, 260-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.006
11. City Hall of Chisinau (2019) Chisinau Green City: Green City Action Plan for the City of Chisinau. RWA Group: Hertfordshire, UK, 2019.
12. Clergeau, P., Linglart, M., Dangeon, M., Morin, S., Paris, M. (2016) La trame verte et bleue à l’épreuve de la ville. In: Traits urbains, 83, 37-40. http://www.urban-eco.fr/IMG/pdf/traitsurbains-clergeau_et_coll._tvu.pdf
13. Fahrig, L. (2017) Ecological Responses to Habitat Fragmentation Per Se. Annual Review of Ecology, Evol. Systematics, 48, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316-022612
14. Fahrig, L., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Bennett, J.R., Boucher-Lalonde, V., Cazetta, E., Currie, D.J., Eigenbrod, F., Ford, A.T., Harrison, S.P., Jaeger, J.A.G., Koper, N., Martin, A.E., Martin, J.-L., Metzger, J.P., Morrison, P., Rhodes, J.R., Saunders, D.A., Simberloff, D., Smith, A.C., Tischendorf, L., Vellend, M., Watling, J.I. (2019) Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity? Biol. Cons., 230, 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.12.026
15. Florescu, T., Popa, A., Rusu, S.-G., Chirilă, C.T., Opriş, A., Pața, I., Bunea, A., Negrea, N., Pătraşcu, R., Mitrea, A. (2015) The architecture of dynamic planning regulations. In Book of Proceedings - 29th Annual AESOP 2015 Congress: Definite Space – Fuzzy Responsibility, July 13–16, 2015, Prague, Czech Republic; Macoun, M., Maier, K., Eds.; AESOP: Prague, Czech Republic, 2015; Volume 28, pp. 2761-2769. https://proceedings.aesop-planning.eu/index.php/aesopro/issue/view/6
16. Florescu, T., Sârbu, C.N., Mitrea, A., Chirilă, C.T., Chiş, A.D., Cocheci, V., Costin, A. V. (2018) The architecture of an intuitive scientific workflow system for spatial planning. Urban. Arhit. Constr., 9(2), 105-120. http://uac.incd.ro/Art/v9n2a01.pdf
17. Grădinaru,S.R.;Iojă,C.I.;Onose,D.A.,Gavrilidis,A.A.;Pătru-Stupariu,I.;Kienast,F.;Hersperger,A.M.Landabandonmentasaprecursorofbuilt-updevelopmentatthesprawlingperipheryofformersocialistcities. Ecol. Indic., 2015,57,305–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.009
18. Grêt-Regamey, A., Altwegg, J., Siréna, E.A., van Strien, M.J., Weibel, B. (2017) Integrating ecosystem services into spatial planning – A spatial decision support tool. Landsc. Urban Plan., 165, 206-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.003
19. Grigorescu, I., Kucsicsa, G., Mitrică, B., Mocanu, I., Dumitraşcu, M. (2022) Driving Factors of Urban Sprawl in the Romanian Plain. Regional and Temporal Modelling Using Logistic Regression, Geocarto Int., 37(24), 7220-7246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1967465
20. Grigorescu, I., Kucsicsa, G., Popovici, E.A., Mitrică, M., Mocanu, I., Dumitraşcu, M. (2019) Modelling land use/cover change to assess future urban sprawl in Romania. Geocarto Int., 36(7), 721-739. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1624981
21. Hansen, R., Olafsson, A.S., van der Jagt, A.P.N., Rall, E., Pauleit, S. (2019) Planning multifunctional green infrastructure for compact cities: What is the state of practice? Ecol. Ind., 96(2), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.042
22. Hegetschweiler, K.T., de Vries, S., Arnberger, A., Bell, S., Brennan, M., Siter, N., Olafsson, A. S., Voigt, A., Hunziker, M. (2017) Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: A review of European studies. Urban For Urban Green., 21, 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.002
23. Ianoş, I., Sîrodoev, I., Pascariu, G. (2012) Land-use conflicts and environmental policies in two post-socialist urban agglomerations: Bucharest and Chişinău. Carpath. J. Earth Environ. Sci., 7(4), 125-136.
24. INCP Urbanproiect, IHS Romania, Business Consulting Institute, BelNIIGradostroitelistva (2007) Master Plan of Chisinau. Chisinau Municipal Council: Chisinau, Moldova, 2007.
25. Jansen, L.J.M. (2007) Harmonization of land use class sets to facilitate compatibility and comparability of data across space and time. J. Land Use Sci., 1(2-4), 127-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/17474230601079241
26. Kowarik,I. (2013)CitiesandWilderness.ANewPerspective. Int. J. Wilderness, 19,32-36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259389620_Cities_and_wilderness_A_new_perspective
27. Kuemmerle, T., Müller, D., Griffiths, P., Rusu, M. (2009) Land use change in Southern Romania after the collapse of socialism. Regional Environ. Change, 9, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-008-0050-z
28. Kupková, L., Bičík, I., Najman, J. (2013) Land Cover Changes along the Iron Curtain 1990-2006. Geografie, 118(2), 95-115. https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2013118020095
29. Legutko-Kobus, P., Nowak, M.J., Petrişor, A.-I., Bărbulescu, D., Crăciun, C., Gârjoabă, A.I. (2023) Protection of Environmental and Natural Values of Urban Areas against Investment Pressure: A Case Study of Romania and Poland. Land, 12(1), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010245
30. Mayrand, F., Clergeau, P. (2018) Green Roofs and GreenWalls for Biodiversity Conservation: A Contribution to Urban Connectivity? Sustainability, 10(4), 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040985
31. Muntean, A.D., Caranfil, R.A., Ilovan, O.R. (2021) Urban Bioregions and Territorial Identities in Romania. The Role of Information and Communication Technology. J Settlements Spatial Plan., 8(S), 78-93. https://doi.org/10.24193/JSSPSI.2021.8.07
32. Müller, D., Kuemmerle, T., Rusu, M., Griffiths, P. (2009) Lost in transition: determinants of post-socialist cropland abandonment in Romania. J Land Use Sci., 4(1-2), 109-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/17474230802645881
33. Niţă, M.R., Năstase, I.-I., Badiu, D.-L., Onose, D.-A., Gavrilidis, A.-A. (2018) Evaluating urban forests connectivity in relation to urban functions in Romanian cities. Carpath. J. Earth Environ. Sci., 13(1), 291-299. https://doi.org/10.26471/cjees/2018/013/025
34. Nowak, M.J., Petrişor, A.-I., Mitrea, A., Filepné Kovács, K., Lukstina, G., Jürgenson, E., Ladzianska, Z., Simeonova, V., Lozyskyy, R., Rezac, V., Pantyley, V., Praneviciene, B., Fakeyeva, L., Mickiewicz, B., Blaszke, M. (2022) The Role of Spatial Plans Adopted at the Local Level in the Spatial Planning Systems of Central and Eastern European Countries. Land, 11(9), 1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091599
35. Ovdii, M. (2019) Expert support and technical assistance for the implementation of the pilot project extending the CORINE Land Cover (CLC) methodology in the Republic of Moldova. Final report. Agency for Land Relations and Cadastre of the Republic of Moldova/State Enterprise Institute of Geodesy, Engineering Research and Cadastre “INGEOCAD”.
36. Pappalardo, V., La Rosa, D., Campisano, A., La Greca, P. (2017) The potential of green infrastructure application in urban runoff control for land use planning: A preliminary evaluation from a southern Italy case study. Ecosyst. Serv., 26B, 345-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.015
37. Pelorosso, R., Della Chiesa, S., Tappeiner, U., Leone, A., Rocchini, D. (2011) Stability analysis for defining management strategies in abandoned mountain landscapes of the Mediterranean basin. Landsc. Urban Plan., 103 (3-4), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.08.007
38. Petrişor, A.-I., Mierzejewska, L., Mitrea, A. (2022) Mechanisms of Change in Urban Green Infrastructure - Evidence from Romania and Poland. Land, 11(5), 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050592
39. Petrişor, A.-I., Mierzejewska, L., Mitrea, A., Drachal, K., Tache, A.V. (2021). Dynamics of Open Green Areas in Polish and Romanian Cities During 2006-2018: Insights for Spatial Planners. Remote Sens., 13(20), 4041. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13204041
40. Petrişor, A.-I., Petrişor, L.E. (2015) Assessing microscale environmental changes: CORINE vs. the Urban Atlas. Present Environ. Sust. Dev., 9(2), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1515/pesd-2015-0027
41. Petrişor, A.-I., Petrişor, L.E. (2021). Recent land cover and use in Romania: A conservation perspective. Present Environ. Sust. Dev., 15(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.15551/pesd2021151007
42. Petrişor, A.-I., Sîrodoev, I., Ianoş, I. (2020) Trends in the national and regional transitional dynamics of land cover and use changes in Romania. Remote Sens., 12(2), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12020230
43. Popa, A. (2012) Aspects of agricultural landscape as a cultural asset in metropolitan areas: case study for Bucharest city. Mokslas – Lietuvos Ateitis / Science – Future of Lithuania, 4(2), 128-134. https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2012.25
44. Popescu, O.C., Tache, A.V., Petrişor, A.-I. (2022) Methodology for Identifying Ecological Corridors: A Spatial Planning Perspective. Land, 11(7), 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11071013
45. Popovici, E.A., Kucsicsa, G., Bălteanu, D., Grigorescu, I., Mitrică, B., Dumitraşcu, M., Damian, N. (2018) Past and future land use/cover flows related to agricultural lands in Romania. An assessment using CLUE-S model and CORINE land cover database. Carpath. J. Earth Environ. Sci., 13(2), 613-628. https://doi.org/10.26471/cjees/2018/013/052
46. Raymond, C.M., Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N., Berry, P., Breil, M., Niţă, M.R., Geneletti, D., Calfapietra, C. (2017) A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environ. Sci. Pol., 77, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008
47. Rusu, A., Ursu, A., Stoleriu, C.C., Groza, O., Niacşu, L., Sfîcă, L., Minea, I., Stoleriu, O.M. (2020) Structural Changes in the Romanian Economy Reflected through Corine Land Cover Datasets. Remote Sens., 12(8), 1323. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12081323
48. Slave, A.R., Iojă, I.C., Hossu, C.A., Grădinaru, S.R., Petrişor, A.-I., Hersperger, A.M. (2023) Assessing public opinion using self-organizing maps. Lessons from urban planning in Romania. Landsc Urban Plan., 231, 104641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104641
49. Stan, M.-I. (2021) A dynamic image of the final authority act of local public administrations exercised by issuing building permits. Case study: the South-East Development Region of Romania. Technium Social Sci. J., 26, 65-79. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v26i1.5337
50. Stan, M.-I. (2022a) Are public administrations the only ones responsible for organizing the administration of green spaces within the localities? An assessment of the perception of the citizens of Constanţa municipality in the context of sustainable development. Technium Social Sci. J., 31, 58-74. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v31i1.6510
51. Stan, M.-I. (2022b) The influence of the real estate market on the economic development of Constanţa County. Technium Social Sci. J., 38, 805-817. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v38i1.7963
52. Tammi, I., Mustajärvi, K., Rasinmäki, J. (2017) Integrating spatial valuation of ecosystem services into regional planning and development. Ecosyst. Serv., 26B, 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.008
53. Turkelboom, F., Leone, M., Jacobs, S., Kelemen, E., García-Llorente, M., Baró, F., Termansen, M., Barton, D.N., Berry, P., Stange, E., Thoonen, M., Kalóczkai, Á., Vădineanu, A., Castrom, A.J., Czúcz, B., Röckmann, C., Wurbs, D., Odee, D., Preda, E., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Rusch, G.M., Martínez Pastur, G., Palomo, I., Dick, J., Casaer, J., van Dijk, J., Priess, J.A., Langemeyer, J., Mustajoki, J., Kopperoinen, L., Baptist, M.J., Peri, P.L., Mukhopadhyay, R., Aszalós, R., Roy, S.B., Luque, S., Rusch, V. (2018) When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning. Ecosyst. Serv., 29C, 566-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.011
54. Vallecillo, S., Polce, C., Barbosa, A., Castillo, C.P., Vandecasteele, I., Rusch, G.M., Joachim, M. (2018). Spatial alternatives for Green Infrastructure planning across the EU: An ecosystem service perspective. Landsc. Urban Plan., 174, 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.001
55. Verburg, P.H., Neumann, K., Noll, L. (2011) Challenges in using land use and land cover data for global change studies. Global Change Biol., 17(2), 974-989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02307.x